Well, today was certainly not our
finest hour. Once again, gun control has been defeated. Amazing. One of my favorite slogans is “Evolution
is a slow process” but come on! Isn’t it
time we made some sane, adult decisions about this? How many more people have
to die? The slaughter in Orlando happened partly because a mentally unbalanced
individual was able to buy an assault weapon.
Perhaps he would have found another way if he couldn’t get his hands on
a gun. Perhaps he would have chosen another target if he couldn’t carry out his
rampage at PULSE. There are many if/thens and none of them matters. The fact is these weapons are made for one
thing only and that is to kill human beings. They are not hunting weapons. You
shoot a deer with one and you have deer dust. They are weapons of human
destruction. Why are civilians allowed to buy them? You can’t by bazookas or
rocket launchers. You can’t go out and purchase hand grenades. It doesn’t make
sense, until you consider the strangle-hold the NRA has over seemingly all of
Washington. Who are these people? Are they running our country? Why are our senators and congressmen listening to the NRA and ignoring the general public?Some claim their Second Amendment rights. The people who wrote the Second Amendment had no
idea there would ever be such a thing as an automatic rifle. By blindly adhering to something written over
200 years ago we deny ourselves the capacity for growth and change. I believe
we are more flexible than that. I believe we have the power to recognize and
make the changes necessary to promote our evolution. Maybe banning the sale of automatic weapons won’t stop these mass shootings but at least
it would remove one element from a complex and terrifying problem and I can't see any reason not to do it I beg everyone to consider this in November.
Please.
Thursday, June 23, 2016
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
The Power of Hate
Can someone explain to me the value of being able to buy
automatic assault weapons? I don’t get
it. These are guns designed for absolutely nothing except killing human
beings. So why should anyone be able to
walk into a gun store and buy one? Whose rights are we violating by not
allowing the sale of these weapons? What
exactly is the argument?
Last
weekend someone used one of these weapons to massacre 49 people. Okay, maybe if
he hadn’t been able to purchase an assault rifle he would have found another
way to act out the rage that had been building in him for so many years.
Probably that’s true. And I know that if you can’t get a gun legally, there are
plenty of choices on the street, but it seems to me removing one of the choices
can’t be a bad thing, even if it’s not the whole solution to that particular
situation. As long as people have access
to assault weapons, we are all at risk.
I am
gay, and the events of last weekend tore at my heart. To be reminded that things haven’t changed as
much as we thought they had, to know there are still people out there who hate
us and think we are the worst kind of human beings hurts deeply. To listen to
the words of a father who would rather have his son labeled an international
terrorist than gay, and to see the hideous results of that kind of thinking is
so very sad to me. I don’t think of the people who died in that club in Orlando
as my gay brothers and sisters. I think of them as my fellow human beings,
ruthlessly cut down when all they were seeking was a good time.
It wasn’t drugs or booze that
caused this. It wasn’t some far away terrorist organization. It was pure, home
grown hatred, one of the most powerful of human emotions, one that kills as
surely as any assault weapon sold.
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Safety?
Like most people, I was saddened
and angry to learn of the events at the Cincinnati Zoo last week. The death of
Harambe, a mature silverback gorilla is horrifying, just as seeing a
four-year-old child being dragged through the water and slammed against rocks
is horrifying. Thanks to the press, social media and the ability to take videos
with a cell phone we were privy to all the brutal details, but I must question
how those details were presented. I was appalled to find the child’s mother
being persecuted on social media as someone who wasn’t taking proper care of
her offspring, resulting in the death of an endangered animal. No. The zoo, when it accepts your entrance
fee, promises safety. Did everyone see the fence around the gorilla enclosure?
A full-grown adult could probably have gotten through, never mind a
four-year-old. Yet, within all the coverage, I only saw one picture of that
fence. We were all too busy blaming the mother, so, in addition to watching her
son nearly get killed, she has to endure the harsh judgment of people who may
not have thought the thing through, to put it kindly. In my opinion the entire
unhappy event is wholly the fault of the zoo. Does anyone take their kid to the zoo without
an expectation of safety? Of course not. We are not in the habit of putting our
children in the path of danger, as far as I know. That woman had every right to expect proper
confinement of the exhibited animals. It was not there. The zoo failed the gorilla, that child, and his mother . Today I hear she isn’t
going to sue, because the zoo has promised to improve the situation, for which
I applaud her. She is taking the high road. I hope the Cincinnati Zoo does the
same. Rest in peace, Harambe.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)